Skip to main content
Download PDF

A digital health peri-operative cognitive-behavioral intervention to prevent transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion (SurgeryPalTM): study protocol for a multisite randomized controlled trial

Trials volume 22, Article number: 506 (2021) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 21 September 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Spinal fusion surgery is associated with severe acute postsurgical pain and high rates of chronic postsurgical pain in adolescents. Psychological distress, sleep disturbance, and low pain self-efficacy predict higher acute pain and likelihood of developing chronic postsurgical pain. Interventions targeting baseline psychosocial risk factors have potential to interrupt a negative trajectory of continued pain and poor health-related quality of life (HRQL) over time but have not yet been developed and evaluated. This randomized controlled trial will test effectiveness of a digital peri-operative cognitive-behavioral intervention (SurgeryPalTM) vs. education-control delivered to adolescents and their parents to improve acute and chronic pain and health outcomes in adolescents undergoing spine surgery.

Methods

Adolescents 12–18 years of age undergoing spinal fusion for idiopathic conditions, and their parent, will be recruited from pediatric centers across the USA, for a target complete sample of 400 dyads. Adolescents will be randomized into 4 study arms using a factorial design to SurgeryPalTM or education control during 2 phases of treatment: (1) pre-operative phase (one-month before surgery) and (2) post-operative phase (1 month after surgery). Acute pain severity and interference (primary acute outcomes) and opioid use will be assessed daily for 14 days following hospital discharge. Chronic pain severity and interference (primary acute outcomes), as well as HRQL, parent and adolescent distress, sleep quality, and opioid use/misuse (secondary outcomes), will be assessed at 3 months and 6 months post-surgery.

Discussion

Demonstration of effectiveness and understanding optimal timing of perioperative intervention will enable implementation of this scalable psychosocial intervention into perioperative care. Ultimately, the goal is to improve pain outcomes and reduce reliance on opioids in adolescents after spine surgery.

Trial registration

NCT04637802 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered on November 20, 2020

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Background and rationale

Spinal fusion surgery is one of the most frequently performed major musculoskeletal surgeries in children and adolescents, with an estimated 12,600 procedures performed in the USA annually [1]. The majority of pediatric spinal fusion surgeries are performed for idiopathic spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis, spondylolisthesis), with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis being the most common. Spinal fusion results in intense acute postsurgical pain and high rates of chronic pain, with 80% of otherwise healthy adolescents reporting moderate to severe acute pain [2,3,4], and up to half reporting persistent pain 6–12 months post-surgery [5,6,7].

Recent biopsychosocial models conceptualize transition from acute to chronic pain as a complex interplay of biological, psychosocial, and sensory mechanisms [8, 9] and highlight the pre- and post-surgery phases as potential opportunities to intervene to prevent chronification of pain [10]. However, there is a lack of understanding of how to halt the transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). In adolescents, psychosocial risk factors including anxiety and depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, low pain self-efficacy, and high parent anxiety are associated with poorer pain and health outcomes at both short- and long-term follow-up after surgery [6, 11,12,13,14,15]. Moreover, adolescents who experience severe acute postsurgical pain are at elevated risk for developing CPSP, a condition marked by chronic pain which impacts health-related quality of life (HRQL) after surgery [14]. Interventions targeting baseline psychosocial risk factors may reduce acute postoperative pain and have potential to interrupt a negative trajectory of continued pain and poor health outcomes.

Limited research has evaluated peri-operative psychosocial interventions in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion [16]. The few existing pilot studies conducted to date have tested brief peri-operative interventions (e.g., relaxation strategies) demonstrating promising reductions in acute anxiety and pain intensity in the hospital [17] and in the first month following surgery [18]. However, there is a gap in measurement of longer-term outcomes to understand whether psychosocial interventions can also reduce occurrence of CPSP. Beyond the context of surgery, a large body of evidence demonstrates that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions are effective for reducing pain and disability in adolescents with existing chronic pain conditions [19]. CBT delivered before or after surgery may also be effective in preventing the transition from acute to CPSP.

Because of the numerous identified barriers (e.g., access, cost) to receiving psychosocial interventions in-person, digital health interventions have emerged as an effective solution to increase access to evidence-based interventions for pain [20,21,22], leading to improvements in pain and disability in adult and pediatric populations [23,24,25,26]. We hypothesize that this approach will also be effective for youth undergoing pediatric spinal fusion and will facilitate widespread dissemination and implementation.

Objectives

This multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to test the effectiveness of a digital CBT intervention called “SurgeryPal” in a factorial design comparing SurgeryPalTM delivered to adolescents and their parents during one or both peri-operative phases (pre- vs. post-surgery) relative to online education (to control for participants’ time and attention). As recommended by PedIMMPACT, primary outcomes are acute and chronic pain severity and interference [27]. Secondary outcomes include HRQL, psychosocial distress, sleep disturbance, and opioid use/misuse. An additional aim will explore mechanisms of intervention effect on preventing CPSP, including reductions in acute pain severity and psychosocial distress.

Methods

Participants and setting

This is a phase II multicenter clinical trial and was approved by the Seattle Children’s Hospital (SCH) Institutional Review Board and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04637802; see online supplementary file 1). This trial forms part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Helping to End Addiction Long-Term (HEAL) initiative, within the Pain Effectiveness Research Network (HEAL Pain ERN) [28], for which trial coordination is provided by the Recruitment and Trial Innovation Centers in the Trial Innovation Network.

The study sample will include adolescents ages 12–18 scheduled to undergo spinal fusion surgery for juvenile/adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, spondylolisthesis or kyphosis and their parents (or caregivers), with a target complete sample of 400 dyads. Complete inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1. Adolescents and their parents will be referred to the study from surgical specialty hospitals across the USA that regularly conduct pediatric spinal fusion surgeries (see online supplementary file 2). Currently, there are 19 activated referring sites. Sites will continue to be added and onboarded, to reach recruitment goals, and we anticipate ~ 25 total sites.

Table 1 Eligibility criteria
Full size table

Recruitment and enrollment

Providers at participating hospitals will approach adolescents and their parents at least 4 weeks prior to surgery to introduce the study. Providers will refer interested families directly to SCH study staff by securely sending families’ contact information, with permission, via the Research Electronic Data Capture system (REDCap) [29]. Families may also self-refer via the REDCap link, or by phone/email. SCH study staff will contact interested families to complete eligibility screening and enrollment via phone. Eligible families will provide consent (parents and adolescents age 18 years) and assent (adolescents < 18 years) verbally and using online forms in REDCap, including consent for sharing of deidentified data for use in future research (see online supplementary file 3).

Trial design and randomization

This study will utilize a single-blinded, randomized 2 × 2 factorial design (see Fig. 1). Block randomization will be used to allocate participants to one of four arms with random block sizes, stratified by participant sex. The randomization allocation table will be implemented using the REDCap randomization framework using an allocation ratio of 1:1:1:1 and will occur directly before treatment assignment. The randomization process will be overseen by an independent statistician, who is not involved with study procedures, including participant recruitment, intervention assignment, or any other forms of participant contact. Randomization results will only be directed to the study coordinator, who will assign participants to the intervention groups. All other study staff including the trial investigators, and data analyst will be blinded to treatment assignment. Care providers will not be informed of treatment assignment, and participation in the study will not affect clinical care. Participants may therefore engage in any other intervention or treatment (e.g., counseling, physical therapy). In the unlikely event of an adverse event, unmasking would be permissible.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study recruitment flow, intervention allocation, and outcomes collected

Full size image

We anticipate enrolling 500 adolescents to reach our target complete sample of 400 and thus expect 125 adolescents in each of the 4 study groups. Group 1 will receive education control during both pre- and post-operative phases and will not receive access to the SurgeryPalTM CBT intervention. Group 2 will receive the pre-operative phase of the SurgeryPalTM CBT intervention and post-operative education. Group 3 will receive pre-operative education and the post-operative phase of the SurgeryPalTM CBT intervention. Group 4 will receive both pre- and post-operative phases of the SurgeryPalTM CBT intervention. Parents will receive the SurgeryPalTM CBT parent intervention or education control in the pre- and post-operative phases, corresponding to the adolescent’s group assignment.

Interventions

Each pre- and post-surgery treatment phase has a duration of 4 weeks, with the pre-operative treatment phase beginning 4–6 weeks before surgery and the post-operative treatment phase beginning 3 weeks post-surgery. All components will be delivered via a website and a mobile app and are self-guided.

Adolescent CBT intervention: SurgeryPalTM mobile application

During the intervention phases, adolescents assigned to CBT intervention will be provided with access to the SurgeryPalTM CBT program delivered via a mobile health application. Adolescents will download the app directly from iPhone or GooglePlay stores to their personal device and log in using a password. The intervention includes cognitive-behavioral strategies and resilience enhancing techniques that are intended to modify anxiety/distress, improve sleep, and reduce pain (Table 2). The mobile application has three functional components: (1) lessons, (2) cognitive behavioral “Skills Practice,” and (3) symptom tracking which triggers “For You” content (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Screenshots from SurgeryPal teen mobile application showing a home screen, b lesson tab, c skills practice, and d symptom tracking

Full size image

Lessons are released weekly during each treatment phase and the intervention is intended to be completed in 3–4 weeks. The app delivers interactive instruction in cognitive skills (e.g., replacing negative thoughts, letting go of worries), relaxation strategies (e.g., deep breathing, imagery, progressive muscle relaxation), sleep hygiene (optimizing sleep duration and sleep quality), and pain coping skills (e.g., using relaxation and distraction to reduce pain). Each lesson’s theme is relevant to the timing of the perioperative period (e.g., “Getting ready for the hospital,” or “Coping at home after surgery”). Videos of adolescents describing their experiences and use of skills before or during recovery from spine surgery are incorporated throughout. Skills are available as guided audio recordings (e.g., mindful breathing) and interactive exercises (e.g., replacing negative thoughts). Adolescents rate emotions before and after practicing the skill and receive automated, tailored feedback based on whether emotions improve, worsen, or stay the same. The symptom tracking component allows adolescents to rate their anxiety/mood, sleep quality, activity limitations, and pain, each day using 11-point numerical rating scales which feeds into a customized graph that allows teens to track their symptoms and progress over time. Tailored “For You” material is released based on symptom ratings (e.g., “Routines for Better Sleep: Your Wind Down and Wake-Up Rituals” if participant reports poor sleep quality).

Parent CBT intervention: SurgeryPalTM website

During the intervention phase, the participating parent will receive access to the parent CBT website while their adolescent uses the SurgeryPal mobile application. The parent intervention provides instruction in cognitive-behavioral strategies to reduce parent anxiety/distress, as well as resilience-enhancing techniques for managing parent challenges with surgery (Table 2). Similar to the teen program, the parent website has 3 functional components: (1) lessons, (2) cognitive-behavioral “Skills Practice,” and (3) assignment review.

Parent lessons are released weekly and deliver interactive instruction in cognitive strategies (e.g., replacing negative thoughts) and relaxation strategies (e.g., deep breathing), as well as content on parent preparation before surgery (e.g., gathering information, talking to your teen before surgery) and strategies for recovery following surgery (e.g., importance of parent self-care). Lesson themes correspond to surgery timing (e.g., “Preparing for surgery” and “Coping at home after surgery”) and contain parent peer videos where parents discuss their experience and helpful strategies for coping with their adolescent’s spine surgery. Each lesson contains a parent assignment to practice and implement skills and strategies learned and triggers release of guided audio recording of skills to the practice section. Parents return to the website to complete interactive assignment review reporting on practice of skills/strategies, and receive tailored feedback based on their responses.

Table 2 Summary of adolescent and parent CBT intervention timing and content
Full size table

Control condition: adolescent and parent education website

Participants assigned to the control condition will receive access to a patient education website developed for this study. The purpose of this condition is to control for time, attention, and online usage and to allow masking to treatment allocation. The education program provides youth and parents with basic information about pediatric spine surgery and what to expect during the acute and recovery phases. Content was compiled from publicly available educational websites about spinal fusion surgery (e.g., Kids Health, Boston Children’s Hospital, Scoliosis Research Society, MyHealth Alberta, WebMD), and does not include any instruction in the behavioral and cognitive skills taught within the SurgeryPalTM program. In our prior RCTs using similar education control sites, parents and youth have shown a high level of engagement and high ratings of treatment credibility [24].

Criteria for discontinuing allocated interventions

Adverse events, if any, are expected to be minor and there are no planned criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions. Participants will be removed from the study by the trial investigators if they are non-compliant with the pre-randomization baseline assessment, undergo a second major surgery (e.g., repeat spinal fusion surgery) or are diagnosed with a new complex medical condition (e.g., cancer) during the study time frame. Timepoints prior to the new presentation of exclusionary condition will be analyzed. Participants may withdraw from the study and intervention at any time.

Treatment fidelity and strategies to improve adherence to interventions

Treatment is standardized for all participants because the intervention is delivered via a web program and mobile application. Research staff will interact with participants regularly to communicate study procedures, encourage program completion, and address general questions/technical issues. Automated reminders using push notifications in the SurgeryPalTM mobile application will also promote adherence to the intervention. Analytics will be used to track participants’ logins, lesson completion, and assignment completion in the web program as well as download and usage of the SurgeryPalTM mobile application.

Assessment plan

All assessments will be completed online through the REDCap database [29] via email/text survey links. Youth and parents will complete a baseline assessment prior to randomization (T1, baseline). Following hospital discharge from surgery, adolescents will complete daily assessments for 14 days (T2, acute outcomes). Adolescents will report on daily pain outcomes for 7 days and adolescents and parents will complete additional outcome measures at 3 months (T3, chronic outcomes) and 6 months (T4, final follow-up) post-surgery. Participants will receive email or phone reminders by study staff to complete survey measures. Automated REDCap alerts will also be used to inform study coordinators about missing data so they can follow-up with participants to obtain responses. Additionally, participants are provided with an Amazon gift card for completing each assessment.

Primary outcome measures

Pain severity and interference. Primary acute and chronic outcomes will be assessed using the 24-h (short) version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a validated patient-reported outcome measure comprised of a pain severity scale (4 items) and a pain interference scale (7 items) [30]. Adolescents will complete this measure daily for 14 days beginning on day 1 after hospital discharge (T2) and will complete the measure daily for 7 days at the follow-up assessments (T3 and T4). Adolescents rate worst, least, average, and current pain severity and rate pain interference on activity, mood, walking, work/school, relations, sleep, and enjoyment of life in the preceding 24 h. Responses are indicated on numerical rating scales with anchors 0 = “No Pain”/“Does not Interfere” and 10 = “Pain as bad as you can imagine”/“Completely Interferes”. The pain severity scale (average of 4 items) and pain interference scale (average of 7 items) will be calculated for each diary day completed. The BPI has been used to assess postsurgical pain intensity and interference in adolescents after major surgery [31].

The acute pain primary outcomes (acute pain severity and interference) will be derived as the individual rate of recovery based on BPI trajectories separately for pain severity and pain interference over 14 days immediately post-discharge (T2). The chronic pain primary outcomes (chronic pain severity and interference) will be assessed as the mean of the participant’s daily pain ratings on the BPI separately for pain severity and pain interference at 3 months post-surgery (T3).

Secondary outcome measures

Table 3 provides details on the secondary outcome measures.

Table 3 Secondary outcomes measures
Full size table

Covariates

Parents will report on socio-demographic factors (age, sex, and race/ethnicity), and adolescents will report on pre-surgery pain severity and interference using the 7-day recall version of the Brief Pain Inventory [43].

Treatment variables

Treatment satisfaction and acceptability. Adolescents and parents will complete the Treatment Evaluation Inventory Short Form, a 9-item self-report measure assessing perceptions of acceptability and satisfaction with the pre- and post-operative treatment content and approach [44], directly after each treatment phase. Select items on this measure were adapted to be specific to treatment of pediatric postsurgical pain. Items are rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and summed to create a total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of treatment satisfaction and acceptability.

Treatment experience. Adolescents and parents will complete a Treatment Experience Survey developed for this study concerning whether they experienced negative effects of study participation (e.g., worrying about pain, overwhelmed with treatment assignments, tension at home) and rate the level of discomfort experienced (0 = “did not affect me/my teen at all” to 3 = “affected me/my teen very negatively”). The number, type, and severity of negative experiences will be summarized. Participants will also report unrelated adverse events via free text response.

Concomitant therapy. Parents will report on additional health services accessed for pain or anxiety management during the pre- and post-operative treatment phases. Responses will be coded into a binary variable indicating whether concomitant therapy was accessed (yes/no).

Data management

Research data will be stored on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant secure server hosted, managed, and monitored by the University of Utah Data Coordinating Center (DCC), with daily backups, and will be deidentified at the earliest possible opportunity. Participant contact information will be stored separately in secure, password-protected databases stored locally on HIPAA-compliant servers at Seattle Children's Research Institute and the University of Washington Institute of Translational Health Sciences. Databases will be linkable only by a unique study identifier.

Data analysis

The primary analyses will be intent-to-treat analyses which will include all participants randomized, with adolescent as the unit of analysis. All regression analyses will adjust for a priori identified demographic variables (age, sex, race/ethnicity), prognostic covariates (pre-surgery pain intensity), and study site. Separate models will be conducted to analyze pain severity and pain interference (primary outcomes), as assessed by the BPI. For multi-item instruments, published rules on treatment of missing data will be followed where available; otherwise, hot deck imputation will be used for individual items for less than 20% missing data. There are no interim analyses planned.

Primary efficacy outcomes

Hypothesis 1 (acute outcomes): Adolescents receiving pre-operative CBT will have a faster rate of recovery of pain severity and interference during the 14 days following hospital discharge, compared to adolescents who receive pre-operative education. The acute outcomes will be assessed before any post-operative intervention has taken place. Therefore, arms 1 and 3 will be combined into the control group (pre-operative education); arms 2 and 4 will be combined into the intervention group (receiving pre-operative CBT intervention) for this analysis (see Table 4). We will apply nonlinear mixed effects models with an exponential decay functional form, to evaluate individual rate of recovery in daily pain severity and interference, or how quickly the process decays/improves from the initial value to the asymptote. Rate parameters will be estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approach and compared using multivariate Wald test. As a further primary analysis, we will treat daily pain severity and interference as repeated measures using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for clustering within participants.

Table 4 Treatment arms
Full size table

Hypothesis 2 (chronic outcomes): Adolescents receiving post-operative CBT alone will have lower pain severity and interference, compared to adolescents receiving education control at 3 months. We will consider the education control arm (arm 1) as the control group and post-operative CBT alone arm (arm 3) as the intervention group. Covariates adjusted linear regression models will examine group differences in average pain severity and interference, as continuous outcomes, at 3 month follow-up.

Hypothesis 3 (chronic outcomes): Adolescents receiving both phases of peri-operative CBT will have lower pain severity and interference compared to adolescents receiving single phase (pre- or post-surgery) intervention or education control alone at 3 months. We will apply linear regression models to examine differences in average pain severity and interference between individual study arms, treated as a 4-level categorical predictor variable.

Secondary analyses

Secondary efficacy outcomes: Additional covariates adjusted regression models will examine differences in secondary acute outcomes (opioid use; T2), and secondary chronic outcomes (HRQL, anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, opioid misuse; T3) between the relevant treatment arms (as noted in primary analyses).

Exploratory analyses: Additional logistic analyses will compare rates of CPSP, a binary variable based on pain intensity and HRQL, at 3 months and 6 months in youth receiving combined pre- and post-operative CBT (arm 4) compared to arms 1, 2, and 3. We will also explore extent through which acute post-operative pain intensity and interference (T2) as well as changes in psychosocial factors (sleep quality, anxiety, and depression; T2-T4 relative to T1) exert their influence on (i.e., mediate) change in pain intensity, HRQL, and pain interference at 3 months follow-up using a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach.

Effect modification will be examined through regression models with interactions and subgroup analysis testing whether there are differential intervention effects across sex, racial, and ethnic groups on primary and secondary acute and chronic outcomes.

Sample size and power calculations

Power calculations on primary pain outcomes are based on data available from our preliminary peri-operative studies [4, 7, 31] and from prior peri-operative intervention studies [16,17,18]. Power analyses for primary acute outcomes were based on rate of recovery using an exponential decay model. Based on pilot data, we assume log(rate) = − 1.21 (SE = 0.38) in the intervention arm, which translates into a half-life (days taken to achieve 50% reduction in BPI outcome from time 0) of 4.13 days. Using a conservative estimate of 35% increased half-life of recovery in the control arm, 31 subjects per arm would provide 90% power; N = 24/arm for 80% power.

For the second acute parameter of interest, power calculations were performed using GEE model on time-averaged difference (TAD) using individual daily repeated measures of BPI scores. In order to detect a group difference of 1.2 with standard deviation 2.0, we need to enroll 199 participants into each of the two comparison groups (total sample of 398; assuming 1:1 allocation of subjects into pre-operative education vs. intervention, within-subject observations follow AR(1) correlation pattern with a correlation coefficient of 0.7, and a missing completely at random rate of 5% each day).

For the primary chronic pain outcomes, to detect a group difference of 1.0 with standard deviation 1.8, 35 subjects are needed per arm for 80% power based on two-sample t test.

The target complete sample is 400 adolescent/parent dyads. Conservatively accounting for 20% attrition, we plan to enroll 500 adolescents but will adjust this if completion rates are > 80%.

Oversight and monitoring

Study monitoring to ensure proper consenting and assenting procedures, maintenance of IRB approval, intervention implementation, and security of databases will be conducted by Trial Innovation Centers (TICs) including the University of Utah DCC and Duke/Vanderbilt Clinical Coordinating Centers (CCCs). The DCC will work closely with research coordinators and principal investigators to oversee study data management. In addition, an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) comprised of experts from pediatric psychology, behavioral interventions, and statistics will convene biannually in an open session followed by a closed session to review study progress, data, and participant safety. Authorship will be determined in accordance with the HEAL Initiative Publication Policy.

Discussion

This study will address a critical gap in knowledge of perioperative interventions targeting psychosocial risk factors to prevent transition from acute to CPSP in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Our trial will use an innovative factorial design to test two intervention phases, pre-operative and post-operative, in order to determine the optimal timing of intervention delivery. This study will build on prior research examining short-term efficacy of peri-operative psychosocial interventions to reduce acute pain intensity by testing improvement on clinically meaningful and longer-term post-surgical outcomes such as chronic pain interference and quality of life. In addition, our recruitment design across multiple pediatric spine centers allows for broad inclusion of youth undergoing spinal surgery at community and academic hospital sites in many different regions of the USA.

To engage wide participation in a peri-operative program, interventions must use flexible, accessible, low-cost delivery models. Research with family stakeholders indicates that teens and parents prefer technology-based delivery within the current system of peri-operative care [45]. To address these needs, we developed the CBT and education interventions to be flexibly delivered via a mobile application and website for deployment in the trial. If successful, following the trial, we will have the unique opportunity for widespread dissemination of the SurgeryPalTM interventions to adolescents receiving care in pediatric spine centers across the country.

The USA currently faces two national health crises relevant to perioperative pain management: rising rates of chronic pain, and an epidemic of opioid addiction and overdose, both of which extend to adolescents [46,47,48,49]. Neurobiological and psychosocial changes occurring during adolescence increase vulnerability to both drug addiction [50] and chronic pain [51]. Pain problems and opioid use/misuse often begin in adolescence and place individuals at risk for lifelong problems [52, 53]. Thus, prevention strategies addressing these health crises must address risk during this vulnerable developmental period. Major musculoskeletal surgeries, such as spinal fusion, are frequently timed for the adolescent period, and are associated with high rates of chronic postsurgical pain. Moreover, opioids are the cornerstone for pain management after these surgeries, and opioid-naïve youth undergoing surgery are at elevated risk for developing persistent opioid use over the subsequent year [54]. Adolescents undergoing major surgeries urgently need effective therapies to reduce pain, in order to mitigate potential for chronic pain, and to reduce exposure to opioids.

By studying a model of prevention during two intervention phases, this trial will take a critical step in pain research by examining whether psychosocial interventions implemented before the inciting event (primary prevention) and/or during the recovery phase (secondary prevention) may prevent acute to chronic pain transition. In addition, this RCT is designed to explore mechanisms underlying treatment effect, which will advance understanding of the transition from acute to chronic pain.

Trial status

Recruitment started December 2020. The current approved protocol is version 1.08 (Initial submission approval date: 07 April 2020; approved version at final journal submission: 28 April 2021). Recruitment is estimated to be complete by December 2023. Any protocol modifications will be updated on ClinicalTrials.gov and on the participants’ consent form.

Availability of data and materials

The study protocol has been reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Clinical Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (Additional file 1). The data collection forms are available from the corresponding author on request. A database for underlying primary data for publications will be made publicly available on the NIH HEAL Initiative central data repository. The database will be de-identified in accordance with the definitions provided in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and will be accompanied by a data dictionary that provides a concise definition of every data element included in the database. The policies for release of and access to this database are in accordance with the HEAL Data Sharing policy as determined by the NIH. Results of this trial will be published in international peer-reviewed journals by the study team.

Change history

Abbreviations

BPI:

Brief Pain Inventory

CPSP:

Chronic postsurgical pain

References

  1. Witt WP, Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A. Overview of hospital stays for children in the United States, 2012. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006.

  2. Ferland CE, Parent AJ, Saran N, Ingelmo PM, Lacasse A, Marchand S, et al. Preoperative norepinephrine levels in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma correlate with pain intensity after pediatric spine surgery. Spine Deform. 2017;5(5):325–33. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Page MG, Stinson J, Campbell F, Isaac L, Katz J. Pain-related psychological correlates of pediatric acute post-surgical pain. J Pain Res. 2012;5:547–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rabbitts JA, Groenewald CB, Tai GG, Palermo TM. Presurgical psychosocial predictors of acute postsurgical pain and quality of life in children undergoing major surgery. J Pain. 2015;16(3):226–34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Batoz H, Semjen F, Bordes-Demolis M, Benard A, Nouette-Gaulain K. Chronic postsurgical pain in children: prevalence and risk factors. A prospective observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(4):489–96. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bja/aew260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Connelly M, Fulmer RD, Prohaska J, Anson L, Dryer L, Thomas V, et al. Predictors of postoperative pain trajectories in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2014;39(3):E174–81. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabbitts JA, Zhou C, Groenewald CB, Durkin L, Palermo TM. Trajectories of postsurgical pain in children: risk factors and impact of late pain recovery on long-term health outcomes after major surgery. Pain. 2015;156(11):2383–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz J, Seltzer Z. Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9(5):723–44. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1586/ern.09.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rabbitts JA, Palermo TM, Lang EA. A conceptual model of biopsychosocial mechanisms of transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain in children and adolescents. J Pain Res. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2147/JPR.S239320.

  10. Rabbitts JA, Kain Z. Perioperative care for adolescents undergoing major surgery: a biopsychosocial conceptual framework. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2019;In press (accepted for publication on 12/26/2018).

  11. Esteve R, Marquina-Aponte V, Ramirez-Maestre C. Postoperative pain in children: association between anxiety sensitivity, pain catastrophizing, and female caregivers' responses to children's pain. J Pain. 2014;15(2):157–68 e1. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Page MG, Campbell F, Isaac L, Stinson J, Katz J. Parental risk factors for the development of pediatric acute and chronic postsurgical pain: a longitudinal study. J Pain Res. 2013;6:727–41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2147/JPR.S51055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rabbitts JA, Fisher E, Rosenbloom BN, Palermo TM. Prevalence and predictors of chronic postsurgical pain in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2017;18(6):605–14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabbitts JA, Palermo TM, Zhou C, Meyyappan A, Chen L. Psychosocial predictors of acute and chronic pain in adolescents undergoing major musculoskeletal surgery. J Pain. 2020;21(11-12):1236–46. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2020.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabbitts JA, Zhou C, Narayanan A, Palermo TM. Longitudinal and temporal associations between daily pain and sleep patterns after major pediatric surgery. J Pain. 2017;18(6):656–63. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson F, Snow S, Hayden JA, Chorney J. Psychological interventions in managing postoperative pain in children: a systematic review. Pain. 2016;157(9):1872–86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. LaMontagne LL, Hepworth JT, Cohen F, Salisbury MH. Cognitive-behavioral intervention effects on adolescents' anxiety and pain following spinal fusion surgery. Nurs Res. 2003;52(3):183–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00006199-200305000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Charette S, Fiola JL, Charest MC, Villeneuve E, Theroux J, Joncas J, et al. Guided imagery for adolescent post-spinal fusion pain management: a pilot study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16(3):211–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pmn.2014.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Palermo TM, Eccleston C, Lewandowski AS, Williams AC, Morley S. Randomized controlled trials of psychological therapies for management of chronic pain in children and adolescents: an updated meta-analytic review. Pain. 2010;148(3):387–97. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palermo TM, de la Vega R, Dudeney J, Murray C, Law E. Mobile health intervention for self-management of adolescent chronic pain (WebMAP mobile): protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;74:55–60. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cct.2018.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Palermo TM, Slack M, Zhou C, Aaron R, Fisher E, Rodriguez S. Waiting for a pediatric chronic pain clinic evaluation: a prospective study characterizing waiting times and symptom trajectories. J Pain. 2019;20(3):339-47.

  22. Peng P, Stinson JN, Choiniere M, Dion D, Intrater H, Lefort S, et al. Dedicated multidisciplinary pain management centres for children in Canada: the current status. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(12):985–91. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/BF03016632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher E, Law E, Palermo TM, Eccleston C. Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD011118.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Palermo TM, Law EF, Fales J, Bromberg MH, Jessen-Fiddick T, Tai G. Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral treatment for adolescents with chronic pain and their parents: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Pain. 2016;157(1):174–85. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Palermo TM, Wilson AC, Peters M, Lewandowski A, Somhegyi H. Randomized controlled trial of an Internet-delivered family cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention for children and adolescents with chronic pain. Pain. 2009;146(1-2):205–13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pain.2009.07.034.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Macea DD, Gajos K, Daglia Calil YA, Fregni F. The efficacy of Web-based cognitive behavioral interventions for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2010;11(10):917–29. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, et al. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9(9):771–83. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. https://heal.nih.gov/research/clinical-research/pain-management-research; Accessed 10/27/2020.

  29. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cleeland C, Ryan K. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(2):129–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rabbitts JA, Groenewald CB, Zhou C. Subacute pain trajectories following major musculoskeletal surgery in adolescents: a pilot study. Can J Pain. 2020; In press.

  32. Chan KS, Mangione-Smith R, Burwinkle TM, Rosen M, Varni JW. The PedsQL: reliability and validity of the short-form generic core scales and Asthma Module. Med Care. 2005;43(3):256–65. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00005650-200503000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39(8):800–12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gryczynski J, Kelly SM, Mitchell SG, Kirk A, O'grady KE, Schwartz RP. Validation and performance of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) among adolescent primary care patients. Addiction. 2015;110(2):240–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/add.12767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. National Institute on Drug Abuse N. Chart of Evidence-Based Screening Tools for Adults and Adolescents. 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/nidamed-medical-health-professionals/tool-resources-your-practice/screening-assessment-drug-testing-resources/chart-evidence-based-screening-tools-adults. Accessed 7 Jan 2021.

  36. Miech RA, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2014: Volume I, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2015. p. 599.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Irwin DE, Stucky B, Langer MM, Thissen D, Dewitt EM, Lai JS, et al. An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):595–607. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11136-010-9619-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lowe B, Wahl I, Rose M, Spitzer C, Glaesmer H, Wingenfeld K, et al. A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2010;122(1-2):86–95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Eccleston C, Mascagni T, Mertens G, Goubert L, et al. The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation. Pain. 2003;104(3):639–46. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00121-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Goubert L, Eccleston C, Vervoort T, Jordan A, Crombez G. Parental catastrophizing about their child's pain. The parent version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-P): a preliminary validation. Pain. 2006;123(3):254–63. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Essner B, Noel M, Myrvik M, Palermo T. Examination of the factor structure of the Adolescent Sleep-Wake Scale (ASWS). Behav Sleep Med. 2015;13(4):296–307. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/15402002.2014.896253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Meltzer LJ, Avis KT, Biggs S, Reynolds AC, Crabtree VM, Bevans KB. The Children’s Report of Sleep Patterns (CRSP): a self-report measure of sleep for school-aged children. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013;9(3):235–45. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.5664/jcsm.2486.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(5):309–18. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kelley ML, Heffer RW, Gresham FM, Elliott SN. Development of a modified treatment evaluation inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assessment. 1989;11(3):235–47. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/BF00960495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rabbitts JA, Aaron RV, Fisher E, Lang EA, Bridgwater C, Tai GG, et al. Long-term pain and recovery after major pediatric surgery: a qualitative study with teens, parents, and perioperative care providers. J Pain. 2017;18(7):778–86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.02.423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nahin RL. Estimates of pain prevalence and severity in adults: United States, 2012. J Pain. 2015;16(8):769–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A, MacNevin RC, McGrath PJ, Parker L, et al. The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain. 2011;152(12):2729–38. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. National Center for Health Statistics CfDCaP. Data Brief 329. Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999–2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db329_tables-508.pdf#page=4. Accessed October 27, 2020.

  49. Volkow ND, McLellan AT. Opioid abuse in chronic pain--misconceptions and mitigation strategies. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(13):1253–63. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1056/NEJMra1507771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chambers RA, Taylor JR, Potenza MN. Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of addiction vulnerability. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(6):1041–52. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Rosenbloom BN, Rabbitts JA, Palermo TM. A developmental perspective on the impact of chronic pain in late adolescence and early adulthood: implications for assessment and intervention. Pain. 2017;158(9):1629–32. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000888.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kashikar-Zuck S, Cunningham N, Sil S, Bromberg MH, Lynch-Jordan AM, Strotman D, et al. Long-term outcomes of adolescents with juvenile-onset fibromyalgia in early adulthood. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):e592–600. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1542/peds.2013-2220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Groenewald CB, Law EF, Fisher E, Beals-Erickson SE, Palermo TM. Associations between adolescent chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse in adulthood. J Pain. 2019;20(1):28–37. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Harbaugh CM, Lee JS, Hu HM, McCabe SE, Voepel-Lewis T, Englesbe MJ, et al. Persistent opioid use among pediatric patients after surgery. Pediatrics. 2018;141(1):e20172439.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank 2Morrow.inc (https://2morrowinc.com/) for the development of the SurgeryPalTM CBT mobile application and the team at Tactica Interactive (https://tactica.ca/) for the development of the SurgeryPalTM websites. The authors also acknowledge contributions from the collaborators in the Trials Innovation Network for support to this project: the Trial Innovation Centers at University of Utah, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Johns Hopkins and Tufts Universities, and the Recruitment Innovation Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH HEAL Initiative, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, P.O. Box 3006, Rockville, MD 20847 [UH3HD102038, MPI: Rabbitts and Palermo], and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (U24TR001597, U24TR001608, U24TR001609, and U24TR001579). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or its NIH HEAL Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Clinical and Translational Research (CCTR), Seattle Children’s Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE MB.11.500.3, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA

    Jennifer A. Rabbitts

  2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Jennifer A. Rabbitts, Caitlin B. Murray & Tonya M. Palermo

  3. Center for Child Health Behavior and Development (CHBD), Seattle Children’s Hospital, 1920 Terry Avenue, Seattle, WA, USA

    Chuan Zhou, Homer Aalfs, Caitlin B. Murray & Tonya M. Palermo

  4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA

    Chuan Zhou & Tonya M. Palermo

  5. Department of Psychology, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, Spain

    Rocio de la Vega

Authors
  1. Jennifer A. Rabbitts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rocio de la Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Homer Aalfs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Caitlin B. Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tonya M. Palermo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JR (Project Leader) and TP are principle investigators of this project; they conceived the study, designed the study protocol, and drafted the protocol manuscript. CZ developed the trial’s statistical analyses and contributed to protocol design and drafting the manuscript; HA is the lead coordinator of the trial and revised the manuscript; RV and CM revised the protocol manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A. Rabbitts.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This trial was approved by the Seattle Children’s Hospital (SCH) Institutional Review Board. Informed consent (parents and adolescents age 18 years) and assent (adolescents < 18 years) will be obtained from all participants verbally and using online forms in REDCap.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Following the publication of the original article, we were notified of an error in Figure 1, the embedded SPIRIT diagram. In the first horizontal blue box, the text should read: “Phase 1: Pre-operative treatment (4 weeks)”.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents.

Supplementary file 1.

World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set.

Supplementary file 2.

Participating SurgeryPal Referral Sites (as of 6/30/2021*).

Supplementary file 3.

Consent and Assent Forms.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabbitts, J.A., Zhou, C., de la Vega, R. et al. A digital health peri-operative cognitive-behavioral intervention to prevent transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion (SurgeryPalTM): study protocol for a multisite randomized controlled trial. Trials 22, 506 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13063-021-05421-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13063-021-05421-3

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215