Skip to main content

Table 3 Overall consistency and discrepancy between protocols and corresponding published reports of academic drug trials by protocol-derived type of study, N = 95 protocols

From: From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials

 

All trials

Exploratory trials

Confirmatory trials

 

n

% (95 % CI)

n

% (95 % CI)*

n

% (95 % CI)*

Number of trials

95

 

42

 

53

 

Overall consistency

37

39 % (29 to 49 %)

21

50 % (35 to 65 %)

16

30 % (18 to 43 %)

Individual discrepancies

Type of study

22

23 % (15 to 32 %)

6

14 % (4 to 25 %)

16

30 % (18 to 43 %)

Primary objective

19

20 % (12 to 28 %)

12

29 % (15 to 42 %)

7

13 % (4 to 22 %)

Primary endpoint

39

41 % (31 to 51 %)

16

38 % (23 to 53 %)

23

43 % (30 to 57 %)

Hypothesis

- 17

-

-

-

5/37

14 % (2 to 25 %)

Sample size calculation

-

-

-

-

17/37

46 % (30 to 62 %)

  1. *Prevalence in each subgroup; for example, 21 of 42 exploratory trials (50 %) showed overall consistency
  2. Based on the subgroup of 37 trials with a confirmatory protocol and more than one confirmatory published report