Skip to main content

Table 3 Proportion of articles addressing each of the 18 abstract reporting elements (n = 174)

From: Reporting quality of abstracts in phase III clinical trials of systemic therapy in metastatic solid malignancies

Reporting elements

Number (%)

1. Identification of the study as randomized

100 (57 %)

2. Abstract specifies whether specific description of the trial design was included (e.g., parallel, cluster, non-inferiority)

34 (20 %)

3. Abstract specifies the eligibility criteria for participants relating to demographics, clinical diagnosis, and comorbid conditions.

171 (98 %)

4. Abstract specifies the setting in which the trial took place (e.e., primary, secondary, tertiary centers)

24 (14 %)

5. Abstract specifies medication intervention intended for each study group

174 (100 %)

6. Abstract specifies the objective or hypothesis of the study

166 (95 %)

7. Abstract clearly states the primary outcome or endpoint in the study

151 (87 %)

8. Abstract describes over what period of time the primary outcome or endpoint was assessed

29 (17 %)

9. Abstract describes the method by which participants were assigned to interventions to ensure adequate concealment (e.g., use of computer or random number table)

22 (13 %)

10. Abstract specifies whether participants, care givers, and those assessing the outcomes were masked or blinded to the group allocation

42 (24 %)

11. Abstract reports absolute numbers of patients randomized to each group

80 (46 %)

12. Abstract reports the status of the trial and whether it is ongoing, closed to recruitment or closed to follow up

39 (22 %)

13. Abstract reports either absolute numbers analyzed in each group or indicates this is an intention-to-treat analysis

45 (26 %)

14. Abstract reports trial results as a summary of the outcome for each group and the contrast between the groups (examples include relative risk, odds ratio, hazard ratio, confidence intervals)

152 (87 %)

15. Abstract explicitly describes any important or unexpected adverse events

129 (74 %)

16. Abstract states conclusions of the trial consistent with reported results.

168 (97 %)

17. Abstract reports registration number and name of trial register

46 (26 %)

18. Abstract lists funding source for study

31 (18 %)