Table 3 Intervention attendance rates before and after the pause and timing of the workshops at 10 sites
Attendance rate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site | Date of workshop | Trial month | Number of experimental group invited (attended) | Number of control group invited (attended) | Total |
Lewisham | April 2010 | 1 | 26 (10) = 38.5% | 23 (11) = 47.8% | |
Wandsworth | May 2010 | 2 | 24 (14) = 58.3% | 24 (10) = 41.7% | |
Merton | June 2010 | 3 | 19 (12) = 63.2% | 19 (7) = 36.8% | |
Average before pause | 69 (36) =50.7% | 66 (28) = 2.4% | 135 (64) = 47.4% | ||
After pause and review of procedures | |||||
Croydon | September 2010 | 6 | 36 (19) = 52.8% | 37 (27) = 73.0% | |
Lambeth | October 2010 | 7 | 17 (13) = 76.5% | 17 (8) = 47.1% | |
Bexley | November 2010 | 8 | 26 (16) = 61.5% | 25 (17) = 68.0% | |
Greenwich | January 2011 | 10 | 24 (20) = 83.3% | 25 (15) = 60.0% | |
Kingston | February 2011 | 11 | 22 (17) = 77.3% | 23 (15) = 65.2% | |
Lewisham 2 | March 2011 | 12 | 16 (13) = 81.3% | 18 (9) = 50.0% | |
Croydon 2 | March 2011 | 12 | 18 (17) = 94.4% | 20 (15) = 75.0% | |
Average after pause | 159 (115) = 72.3% | 165 (106) =64.2% | 324 (221) = 68.2% | ||
Overall | 228 (151) = 65.8% | 231 (134) = 58.0% | 459 (285) = 62.1% | ||