Skip to main content

Table 5 Most frequently identified facilitators to enhancing, addressing or reporting intervention fidelity

From: Surveying knowledge, practice and attitudes towards intervention fidelity within trials of complex healthcare interventions

Facilitator

Number (%)

Knowledge of how to assess or enhance

209 (80.1)

Availability of validated tools or checklists

202 (77.4)

Availability of practical guidance

180 (69)

Clear understanding of the definition

168 (64.4)

Perceived importance by researchers

164 (62.8)

Funding or monetary resources

136 (52.1)

Perceived importance by academic journals

132 (50.6)

Accessibility of methodologists or people with specific fidelity expertise

123 (47.1)

Availability of reporting criteria

121 (46.4)

Time

114 (43.7)

Priority given by journals

84 (32.2)

Do not know

2 (0.8)

Othera

7 (2.7)

 Perceived importance by funders

2 (0.8)

 Perceived importance by providers

2 (0.8)

 Perceived importance by principal investigators

1 (0.4)

 Translation from research to real world setting

1 (0.4)

 Training

1 (0.4)

  1. aAdditional facilitators identified by participants