Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Original Submission
22 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paulo Evora
19 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaw Yuan Wang
24 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abouarab
28 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Tvilling Madsen
29 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - EMILIANO RODRIGUEZ-CAULO
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - EMILIANO RODRIGUEZ-CAULO
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - EMILIANO RODRIGUEZ-CAULO
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paulo Evora
28 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Madsen
29 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaw Yuan Wang
29 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abouarab
8 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - EMILIANO RODRIGUEZ-CAULO
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - EMILIANO RODRIGUEZ-CAULO
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
19 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Madsen
19 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abouarab
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
19 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
17 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page