7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felipe Castañeda|
|27 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elena Bignami|
|28 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abouarab|
|28 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Carcillo|
|12 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nick Daneman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felipe Castañeda|
|21 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elena Bignami|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13063-018-2474-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.