Skip to main content

Table 2 Patients: percentage of items rated essential within the non-comparative and comparative context (a consistency effect)

From: Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial

Context of rating

Percentage of items rated essential by a participant, median (IQR)

Difference in medians (clinical minus PROs) (95% CI)a

PROs (38 items)

Clinical (30 items)

Appearing first (non-comparative)

65.8 (47.4–89.5)

96.7 (73.3–100.0)

30.9 (11.8–39.2)

Appearing last (comparative)

89.5 (60.5–97.4)

96.7 (63.3–100.0)

7.2 (−1.4–13.2)

Difference in medians (last minus first) (95% CI)a

23.7 (10.5–40.8)

0.0 (0.0–20.0)

−23.7

  1. Number of patients: PRO first n = 59; PRO last n = 57
  2. aBias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI