Skip to main content

Table 8 Compared baseline characteristics of the CardioBBEAT, TIM-HF and INH study participants

From: First outline and baseline data of a randomized, controlled multicenter trial to evaluate the health economic impact of home telemonitoring in chronic heart failure – CardioBBEAT

Variable

CardioBBEAT

TIM-HF

INH

Usual care

Monitoring

Usual care

Monitoring

Usual care

Monitoring

(n = 319)

(n = 302)

(n = 356)

(n = 354)

(n = 363)

(n = 352)

Demographic profile

      

  Age (years)

63.5 ± 11.4

62.5 ± 11.6

66.9 ± 10.5

66.9 ± 10.8

69.4 ± 11.5

67.7 ± 12.8

  Male sex (%)

88

87

82

81

71

71

  Living alone (%)

24

27

22

21

35

30

Clinical profile

      

  NYHA class (%)

      

   I

0

0

0

0

2

3

   II

65

73

51

50

62

54

   III

34

26

49

50

31

40

   IV

1

1

0

0

5

3

Risk factor profile

      

  BMI (kg/m2)

28 ± 5

28 ± 5

28 ± 5

28 ± 5

n.a.

n.a.

  Diabetes mellitus (%)

32

38

39

40

36

36

  Hypertension (%)

84

87

66

68

77

72

Diagnostic

      

  Heart rate (1/min)

72 ± 14

72 ± 13

71 ± 13

71 ± 13

80 ± 18

80 ± 20

  LVEF (%)

31 ± 7

30 ± 8

27 ± 6

27 ± 6

30 ± 8

30 ± 8

Medication (%)

      

  ACE inhibitor/ARB

93

93

97

94

87

89

  Beta blocker

95

96

93

92

79

81

  Diuretics

80

83

94

94

86

90

  1. ACE angiotensin converting enzyme, ARB angiotensin receptor blocker, BMI body mass index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, n.a. not available, NYHA New York Heart Association, classification of heart failure