Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Figures in clinical trial reports: current practice & scope for improvement

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
21 Jun 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Gelman
12 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Milo Puhan
30 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Schriger
11 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Pocock
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Pocock
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Pocock
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Pocock
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Nov 2007 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2007 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-8-36

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement