- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Exploring the role and functionality of trial steering committees
Trials volume 16, Article number: P189 (2015)
Independent oversight of clinical trials, recommended by Good Clinical Practice, is typically provided by an independent advisory Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) and an independent executive committee, to whom the DMC make recommendations. The detailed role and functionality of this executive committee, known as the Trial Steering Committee (TSC) have not been studied since proposed by the MRC.
An expert panel was convened comprising statisticians, clinicians and trial methodologists with prior TSC membership experience. Twelve questions about the role and functionality of the TSC were discussed by the panel at two full-day meetings. Each meeting was transcribed in full and discussions summarised.
The expert panel reached agreement on the role of the TSC, who they worked for, membership and the definition of independence, and the experience and training needed. The management of ethical issues, difficult/complex situations and issues the TSC should not ask the DMC to make recommendations upon were more difficult to discuss without specific examples. Additional topics discussed, not identified by the DAMOCLES study but pertinent to the role of the TSC, included: indemnity; lifespan of the TSC and role of the sponsor.
Expert panel discussion and subsequent recommendations will contribute to revision and update of the MRC TSC terms of reference. Uncertainty still remains in some areas due to the absence of published real-life examples. A repository for case studies would be useful. Public contribution to trial oversight was not discussed and warrants further consideration.
About this article
Cite this article
Harman, N., Conroy, E., Lewis, S. et al. Exploring the role and functionality of trial steering committees. Trials 16, P189 (2015) doi:10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P189
- Clinical Practice
- Ethical Issue
- Expert Panel
- Good Clinical Practice
- Executive Committee