Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcomes in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that historically controlled studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Jul 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicolas Rasmussen|
|2 Sep 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Morris|
|8 Oct 2014||Author responded||Author comments - veronica moroz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Oct 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Oct 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Morris|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Nov 2014||Editorially accepted|
|10 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-15-481|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.