Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcomes in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that historically controlled studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
11 Jul 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicolas Rasmussen
2 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Morris
8 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - veronica moroz
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Morris
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
5 Nov 2014 Editorially accepted
10 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-15-481

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement