Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial

Original Submission
18 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Merry
27 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Dawn Kingston
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Dawn Kingston
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
2 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-15-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page