Open Peer Review Reports for: When enough is enough: how the decision was made to stop the FEAST trial: data and safety monitoring in an African trial of Fluid Expansion As Supportive Therapy (FEAST) for critically ill children
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Ellenberg |
6 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - david schoenfeld |
3 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jim Todd |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Ellenberg |
5 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jim Todd |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Publishing | ||
13 Mar 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-85 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.