Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Should I eXtract Every Six dental trial (SIXES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
31 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Innes
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Innes
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Chadwick
24 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Innes
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Chadwick
10 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Innes
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
27 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-14-59

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement