Skip to main content

Table 1 Systematic review: summary of characteristics of included studies

From: Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Study

Population

Lead author (year), reference, country, type and recruitment dates

Study design

Implanted N (tested N)

Description (as stated by authors) and indication

Age, gender, post back surgery

Baseline VAS/NRSa

Burgher [17] USA, single center, August 2009 to December 2010

Retrospective case series

6 (10)

‘Axial back and neck pain’

Mean 53 years, 20% male, not reported

Not reported

‘All patients had failed more conservative treatment…’

All predominantly axial pain

Campbell [12] USA, single center, July 1974 to August 1975

Case series

10 (NR)

‘Low back pain syndrome with sciatica’

Mean 48 years, 20% male, not reported

Not reported

‘Persistent disabling pain despite all traditional medical and surgery’

Falco [16] USA, single center, August 2008 to April 2009

Case series

18b (28)

‘Chronic [non-appendicular] pain that had not responded to conservative or surgical treatment and whose pain significantly impacted their quality of life’

Mean 56 years, 28% male, not reported

Mean 9.1

‘Many of the patients had multiple sources and areas of chronic pain for years’

‘…in several cases, [failed] lumbar spine surgery.’

Paicius [13] USA, single center. May 2005 to September 2006

Case series

6 (NR)

‘History of chronic low back pain’

Mean 63 years, 50% male, 83%

Mean 9.1

Majority of patients followed lumbar surgery

Sator-Katzenchlager [14] Austria, multicenter June 1999 to February 2007

Retrospective case series

66c (NR)

‘Failed back surgery syndrome’ and ‘low back pain’

Mean 59 years, 48% male, 56%

Mean 8.2

‘Prior failure of systemic or less invasive \treatments….and no indication for further surgery’

Verrills [15, 19] Australia, single center, dates not reported

Retrospective case series

23b (NR)

‘Failure to respond to conservative treatment….almost all patients had also failed surgical procedures’

Mean 58 years, 39% male, not reported

Not reported

‘Low back pain’

Verrills [18, 19] Australia, single center, dates not reported

Prospective case series

44d (NR)

‘Lumbrosacral pain’

Range 27 to 88 years, 43% male, not reported

Mean 8.1

‘Failure to respond to other conservative therapy’

Yakovlev [20] USA, single center August 2007 to July 2009

Retrospective case series

18 (NR)

‘Chronic low back and lower extremity pain associated with PLS after multilevel spinal surgical procedures’

Mean 62 years, 61% male, 100%

12

  1. Population indicates number of patients with CLBP pain unless other stated.
  2. a0 to 10 scale.
  3. bMixed indication case series: unclear N CLBP/FBSS.
  4. bMixed indication case series of N = 111.
  5. dMixed indication case series of N = 100.
  6. (C)LBP (chronic) low back pain, FBSS failed back surgery syndrome, NR not reported, NRS numeric rating scale, PLS post laminectomy syndrome, VAS visual analog scale.