Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Wouter van Dijk |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Wouter van Dijk |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard O'Connor |
| 3 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vernon M Chinchilli |
| 11 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wouter van Dijk |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 11 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 12 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard O'Connor |
| 13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vernon M Chinchilli |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wouter van Dijk |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 28 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wouter van Dijk |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 28 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-37 |
You can find further information about peer review here.